One thought on “Do women exist? – the science of sex, the politics of gender, and the materialist and dialectical thinking needed to distinguish the two”
Good article. Radical feminism is materialist, not “essentialist.” Sex is a biological material reality, upon which oppressive social structures have been built. The oppression of women is based upon our reproductive capacities. It is the gender ideologues who are the essentialist ones, claiming some mystical inner essential nature to which they give the name “woman”, even though it is completely indefinable, except by stereotypes, and has no grounding in material reality or in the human body.
RT @karolyn_is: 58 female MPs in NZ Parliament - i.e. 48% of the MPs
All with their heads down letting the rights, services & protections… 20 hours ago
RT @ClimateBen: Why are we still listening to journalists who don't frame ALL their reporting with the critically urgent need for breathtak… 20 hours ago
Good article. Radical feminism is materialist, not “essentialist.” Sex is a biological material reality, upon which oppressive social structures have been built. The oppression of women is based upon our reproductive capacities. It is the gender ideologues who are the essentialist ones, claiming some mystical inner essential nature to which they give the name “woman”, even though it is completely indefinable, except by stereotypes, and has no grounding in material reality or in the human body.