One thought on “Do women exist? – the science of sex, the politics of gender, and the materialist and dialectical thinking needed to distinguish the two”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Facebook Page
Translate
-
Recent Posts
- Marx vs Keynes: What’s the matter with ‘peak’ idealism? March 16, 2021
- March 8: International Women’s Day in the Time of Existential Crisis for Humanity March 4, 2021
- Aotearoa: Land of the Wrong White Rent Seekers. Part Two – Socialising Land, Labour and Capital January 14, 2021
- Aotearoa: Land of the Wrong White Rent Seekers December 25, 2020
- Victory for Keira Bell! December 20, 2020
Pages
Archives
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- September 2014
- May 2014
- April 2013
- February 2013
- July 2012
- November 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- April 2009
- May 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Blogroll
Marxism in NZ
sources
- Antipodean Marxism meets Indigenous Peoples Struggles
- Auckland, antipodean portal to Empire
- Australasia: the Unfinished Revolution
- Beyond Dependency or Beyond Capitalism?
- Contesting Class Globally
- On the Domestic Mode of Production
- Rich and Poor in New Zealand
- Towards a Socialist Australasia
- Who's Right on the Left?
Meta
Categories
- Afghanistan
- alienation
- Aotearoa
- Auckland
- australasia
- australia
- bourgeois democracy
- Budget
- bureaucracy
- Cannabis reform
- Capital
- capitalism
- coal mining
- Corbyn
- Crisis
- education
- elections
- fascism
- fetishism of commodities
- Foucault
- Global Warming
- Hit and Run
- imperialism
- Imperialist war
- indigenous people
- Intellectuals
- Jacinda Ardern
- Labourism
- Lenin
- maori
- Marxism
- Medical Cannabis
- multitude
- NACTs
- New Zealand
- NZ SAS
- Panama Papers
- postmodernism
- racism
- Red Federation
- Rose Renton
- Settler colony
- sociology
- suicide
- surplus value
- Taleban
- taxation
- TPPA
- Transitional Program
- Trotskyism
- Trump
- UBI
- Uncategorized
- unions
- United States
- War Crimes
- War on Terror
- Winston Peters
- Work
- workers democracy
- Workers Government
- workers militias
- yellow ribbon
- youth
- Follow Situations Vacant on WordPress.com
Ideas for blogs or not
- @roblogic_ What's the difference between rugby and the church? Threepents. 7 hours ago
- @tommygun1964 Who am I to comment? Seems to be a pansexual. But seeing its you I would go with your instinct. 7 hours ago
- RT @ahamrick: Just gonna keep retweeting this because it’s outrageous twitter.com/KnownHeretic/s… 9 hours ago
- RT @stellaomalley3: For people who still don't understand the true danger of conversion therapy economist.com/middle-east-an… 9 hours ago
- RT @K_IngalaSmith: When people asked if I thought the outcry in response to the death of SarahEverard marked a watershed in responses to me… 9 hours ago
Good article. Radical feminism is materialist, not “essentialist.” Sex is a biological material reality, upon which oppressive social structures have been built. The oppression of women is based upon our reproductive capacities. It is the gender ideologues who are the essentialist ones, claiming some mystical inner essential nature to which they give the name “woman”, even though it is completely indefinable, except by stereotypes, and has no grounding in material reality or in the human body.